Improving Access to Nature in Urban Environments

Improving Access to character in urban EnvironmentsIn an urbanizing world, discuss the value of kilobyte and aristocratical aloofnesss in towns and cities and describe somewhat of the approaches being habituated to amend attack to record.Introduction50 geezerhood after Henri Lefebvre identified seeds of planet Trantor, Isaac Asimovs (1995) completely urbanized cognition fiction planet, amidst the Earths urbanization (Merrifield, 2013), 54% of global cosmos today are urban dwellers, and it is projected to increase to 66% in 2050 (United Nations, 2014). Lefebvres prognostications are coming true at a stagger pace. Such booming population growth in cities and towns puts immense wardrobe on ever-shrinking urban spaces. In light of competing land use, the frantic seeking of economic prosperity and social advancement has neglected urban parking area and aquatic purlieus. Many remain incognizant of the importance of nature and its nark in spite of appearance progressive ly concretized landscapes. The benefits and detriments of urban spirt and pitiful spaces will be explored using a multi-dimensional approach considering various aspects of urban natures importance.Health DimensionTo begin with, from the perspective of well-being, green and toothsome purlieus meet a fundamental human need for a conducive environment. man evolution surmise suggests that modern humans brook commenceed a certain genetic inclination to respond positively to habitat settings thriving to survival and well-being of their ancestors (Kellert and Wilson, 1993). These responses are believed to be triggered when immersed within nature. As such(prenominal), the corrective effects of nature seem to serve as graphic tranquilizers amidst the urban hustle and bustle (van den Berg et al., 1998). For instance, Ulrich (1984) dis veiled that hospital patients with the prospect to look out onto greenery recovered much quicker from operating room than those whose views were co nfined to buildings. This reflects the recuperative influences of green spaces on well-being of urban dwellers. march on research also strengthened evidence of restorative sounds and visual properties of peeing supply and waves within aquatic spaces (White et al, 2010). The array of physical and spiritual healing functions of animationlike environments provide the basis of human needs that make cities and towns getable.Socio-Spatial Dimension locomote on, from a social paradigm, natural environments within urban localities can aid social progression by allowing people to seek worked up asylum while providing valued recreational space. The free world of the public approximate range has endlessly evolved a pre-lapsarian world of innocence and autonomy (Thompson, 2002, p. 66). Indeed, chasing after reform lives and getting to places on time have caused personal time to be left behind amidst busy cosmopolitan lifestyles. The serene natural environment is perhaps the only p lace where one could seek emotional protective cover in terms of privacy and self-reflection. In addition to being emotional sanctuaries, urban green and blue spaces represent extended recreational space amidst congested urban environments. Growing urban populations are forcing people to live even closer than ever before as land use be coifs competitive. For instance, half of Hong Kongs population is housed within continuously shrinking sustentation space at approximately 13.4m per individual (Hong Kong Housing Authority, 2014). Increasing propinquity between humans generates feelings of confinement within countless of man-made walls. Hence, the forepart of open green and blue spaces allow urban dwellers to step outside(a) from the highly-constrained landscapes of built environments, where there is space for ones privacy and for hammer social relationships free from cramped cities and towns.While recognising the importance of urban green and blue spaces, it would be myopic to o verlook any emf detriments. Although these natural environments are paradise away from stressful urban life, they could also be harbour effectiveness danger. These natural habitats provide wild breeding cause for abuse and incivilities, and could be a place of fear and anxiety (Thompson, 2002, pp. 66). question studies revealed that visitors to promenades along the Rhine in Cologne and Dsseldorf, especially women and elderly, were concerned roughly theft and harassment in addition to issues of victimisation (Vlker and Kistemann, 2013, pp. 120). The manifestation of crime and anti-social behaviour creates negative perceptions and feelings of powerlessness that indirectly erect mental barriers for potential nature users.Development DimensionApart from the benefits that urban inhabitants enjoy, it is also unequivocal that we consider the advantages of having urban natural environments within cities and towns. urban green and blue spaces contribute to the sustainable evolution o f built environments, in both economic and ecological dimensions. search conducted by White et al. (2010) revealed that have green and blue environments were most preferred, depicted in Fig 1.Fig 1 Research deaths on Environment Preference RatingsSource White et al. (2010), pp. 487The aesthetic supplicant of nature highlighted above translates to higher fiscal revenue and monetary returns for the urban settlement. For instance, people were found to be willing to pay almost 8% to 12% more than for housing properties with views of water and green interface crossways several districts within the Netherlands (Luttik, 2000). In addition, urban greenery also attracts greater influx of foreign investments into cities and towns, exemplified by the beautification of Singapore as a garden city that propelled the citys economic rise (Braatz, 1993). Hence, the presence of green and blue spaces in urban areas create positive perceptions of pleasant environments, which makes cities and to wns more alluring in the economic sense.Furthermore, ecological footprints of urban development could potentially be mitigated. Research has shown that 85% of air pollutants and dust particles can be filtered out in a typical-sized urban park (Bolund and Sven, 1999), In addition, the combined effects of green and blue spaces are also effective in combating the urban heat island effect. Ambient temperatures within Chapultepec Park in Mexico city were observed to be 2C to 3C dismay than surrounding urban areas (Jauregui, 1990/1991). The presence of natural spaces back ups to regulate the urban environment and make cities and towns more hospitable. For any urban settlement pursuing sustainable development, these green and blue spaces may hold the answers.Improving Access to NatureGrowing understanding of the urban natures beneficial outcomes and potential detriments has generated renewed focus on making nature more accessible. diametric definitions of change access underpin the my riad of strategies and implementations that have been adopted.Firstly, the shift in focus towards green infrastructure which involves enhancing engineered water infrastructure by combine nature with urban grey infrastructure have become increasingly popular (Wendel et al., 2011). This approach interprets improving accessibility as increasing the dispersion of natural spaces. Recent academic literature suggest that we may have to bring nature to people rather than have people come to nature, especially in urbanized environments (Lin et al., 2014, pp. 6). Thus, nature should be incorporated into alert urban infrastructure to raise opportunities for encounters. In Tampa, Florida, converted storm water ponds set upd with green spaces saw a 35% increase in walking access (Wendel et al., 2011). On the other hand, in South-East London, such incorporation was done through the restoration of a section of river Ravensbourne within Cornmill Gardens by replacing concrete encasements with na tural sloping banks and bank plant (The London Rivers Action Plan, 2009). These strategies, combining landscape and water management, mimics natural watersheds to enhance urban hydrology while greatly improving public access.Another dodge to improve accessibility points towards public education espousing human connections with nature. This approach understands improving access through raising motivation to visit nature. Education theory suggests that biophilia (Kellert and Wilson, 1993) and interest in nature are encouraged by advance(prenominal) childhood experiences (Stokes, 2006). Removal of such experiences would dramatically reduce ones motivation to visit nature regardless of accessibility. To illustrate, the Forest Schools Education (FSE) course was originally developed to develop a greater affinity with nature for pre-school children in Denmark. This Scandinavian concept, now adopted across pre-schools worldwide, develops childrens admiration of nature through regular vi sits to natural spaces for play (Forest Schools Education, 2013). Cultivating ones orientation towards nature through interactive opportunities can therefore develop life-long motivations to visit the natural environment.Thirdly, improving accessibility by reducing barriers to impost advocates the improvement of public amenities within natural spaces. This approach focuses on creating safe and conducive conditions for public access to nature with a ease of mind. This greatly reduces perceptions of danger and encourages frequent access. In Santa Cruz, Bolivia, over 65% of respondents highlighted pencil eraser as the main obstacle that limited accessibility of nature (Wendel et al., 2012). Hence, access to nature can be augmented through improved public amenities and infrastructure to make these spaces safer. In Bogota, Columbia, improving access to nature focused upon heightened security and safety through installing fences, increasing furnish guard patrol frequencies and improvi ng lighting conditions (Berney, 2010). Thus, safe natural environments would encourage more frequent visits and greatly reduce deterrence of usage associated with perceptions of danger.ConclusionBeing indispensable ecological assets in todays urbanizing world, urban green and blue environments deliver an extensive range of crucial functions that cover health and social benefits to ecological and economic goals. Facilitating public access to these lungs of the city (Sutton, 1971) through a spectrum of interventions ensure that the opportunities and perks provided by these urban ecosystems help improve the quality of urban life. As planet Earth increasingly resembles Trantor more than ever before, we must realize that in order to sustain the development of cities and towns, urban natural environments are a must-have rather than a nice-to-have.1509 spoken languageBibliographyAsimov, I. 1955. Foundation, (Voyager Paperback, London).Berney, R. 2010. Learning from Bogota How municipal ex perts transformed public spaces, Journal of Urban Design, 15(4) pp. 539 558.Bolund, P. and Sven, H. 1999. Ecosystem Services in Urban Areas, Ecological economics, 29 pp. 293 301.Braatz, S. 1993. Urban Forestry in Developing Countries Status and Issues, in Kollin, C., Mahon, J. and Frame, L. (eds) Proceedings of the Sixth National Urban Forest Conference Minneapolis, Minnesota, September 14-18, 1993, (American Forests, Minnesota).Forest Schools Education, 2013. Introduction to Forest Schools, http//www.forestschools.com/course-material/forest-schools-general/, Accessed eleventh October 2014.Hong Kong Housing Authority, 2014. Housing in Figures 2014, https//www.housingauthority.gov.hk/en/common/pdf/about-us/publications-and-statistics/HIF.pdf.Jauregui, E. 1990/1991. Influence of a large urban park on temperature and convective precipitation in a tropical country, Energy and Buildings, 15 16 pp. 45 63.Kellert, S.R. and Wilson, E.O. 1993. The biophilia hypothesis, (Island Press, Wa shington DC).Lin, B., Fuller, R., Bush, R., Gaston, K. and Shanahan, D. 2014. prospect or Orientation? Who Uses Urban Parks and Why, PLOS ONE, 9(1) pp. 1 7.Luttik, J. 2000. The value of trees, water and open space as reflected by house prices in the Netherlands, landscape painting and Urban Planning, 48 pp. 161 167.Merrifield, A. 2013. The Urban Question under Planetary Urbanization, internationalist Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37.3 pp. 909 922.Rosenzweig, M.L. 2003. Win-Win Ecology How The Earths Species commode Survive In The Midst of Human Enterprise, (Oxford University Press, New York).Stokes, D.L. 2006. Conservators of Experience, BioScience, 56(1) pp. 6 7.Sutton, S.B. (ed.). 1971. Civilizing American Cities A Selection of Frederick Law Olmsteds Writings on urban center Landscapes, (MIT Press, Cambridge).The River Restoration Centre, 2009. The London Rivers Action Plan A tool to help restore rivers for people and nature, http//www.therrc.co.uk/lrap/lplan.pdf .Thompson, C.W. 2002. Urban open space in the twenty-first Century, Landscape and Urban Planning, 60 pp. 59 72.Ulrich, R.S. 1984. View through a window may influence recovery from surgery, Science, 224 pp. 420 421.United Nations, Department of Economic and well-disposed Affairs, Population Division, 2014. World Urbanization Prospects The 2014 Revision, Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/352).van den Berg, A.E., Maas, J., Verheij, R.A. and Groenewegen, P. 2010. unripe space as a buffer between stressful life events and health, Social Science and Medicine, 70 pp. 1203 1210.Vlker, S. and Kistemann, T. 2013. Im always entirely happy when Im here Urban blue enhancing human health and well-being in Cologne and Dsseldorf, Germany, Social Science and Medicine, 78 pp.113 124.Wendel, H.E., Downs, J.A. and Milhelcic, J. 2011. Assessing Equitable Access to Urban commonalty dummy The Role of Engineered Water Infrastructure, Environmental Science and Technology, 45 pp. 6728 6734.Wendel, H.E., Zarg er, R. and Mihelcic, J. 2012. Accessibility and usability Green space preferences, perceptions and barriers in a rapidly urbanizing city in Latin America, Landscape and Urban Planning, 107 pp. 272 282.White, M., Smith, A., Humphryes, K., Pahl, S., Snelling, D. and Depledge, M. 2010. Blue Space The importance of water for preference, fall and restorativeness ratings of natural and built scenes, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30 pp. 482 493.